Thursday, April 18, 2019

New York Times X/XX/20XX

*the following is a fictional New York Times Op-Ed, presenting an argument against the "Bill of Life" at the end of the Heartland War


TOTAL INSANITY!!
The proposed so-called "Bill of Life" fails entirely to understand the basic arguments which sparked the current conflict. Nobody on the pro-choice side is there because the have a desire to abort children, and if the pro-life side is really so convinced that life is sacred, they would never consent to something as lunatic as a "safe period" followed by total ownership through the easily abused teenage years when who knows how many would be "unwound" simple because their parents got tired of dealing with moody, rebellious children? What kind of mental gymnastics does it take to believe that someone is still alive when they've been chopped up and spread around as transplants? Yes, their body parts still live, but the person they were is dead.

No comments:

Post a Comment